Verigrey
Transportation & logistics

When agents touch operations, mistakes get physical. Prove yours stay in bounds.

Verigrey tests transportation and logistics agents against your operational and safety policies — blocking unauthorized or unsafe actions before they execute, and re-testing on every change.

Live routing-action inspection
Dispatch action · route override
proposed route exceeds driver hours-of-service limit
FLAGGED · operational limit
PROVEevidence · 0x2f6c…19a3
Why agents are different here

This isn't a generic agent-risk problem.

Operational decisions now affect safety, not just data, and many operators fall under CISA critical-infrastructure expectations — with agents wired directly into scheduling, routing, and control systems.

Physical consequences
Operational decisions affect safety, not just data.
Critical infrastructure
Many operators fall under CISA/critical-infra expectations.
Complex tool access
Agents are wired to scheduling, routing, and control systems.
Common agent use cases

The agents this buyer is actually deploying.

Logistics / dispatch optimization agent

Optimizes routing and scheduling decisions.

FailureProposes an unsafe or non-compliant routing action.
FixPolicyForge + DeepScan.

Fleet / maintenance copilot

Assists fleet and maintenance operations staff.

FailureHas over-broad access to control or telematics systems.
FixFixLoop.

Customer-facing booking / support agent

Handles passenger bookings and support requests.

FailureLeaks passenger PII or makes an unauthorized change.
FixDeepScan + RuntimeGuard.

Ops-decision-support agent

Recommends operational actions to staff.

FailureTakes a destructive or irreversible operational action without an approval gate.
FixPolicyForge + DeepScan.
Specific risks

What keeps you up at night.

Unsafe / unauthorized operational actions

Safety regulator

Agent proposes or executes an action outside a defined safety boundary.

Destructive actions without approval

CISA / NIST CSF

Irreversible operational change executes with no human approval gate.

Passenger-PII leakage

GDPR / CCPA

Booking or support agent exposes passenger data to the wrong party.

Over-broad control-system access

NIST CSF 2.0

Copilot reaches further into telematics or control systems than the task requires.

How Verigrey solves it

Across the full lifecycle — Define to Prove.

DeepScan tests the agent\u2019s actual behavior at the IT/OT boundary without needing source access to control systems, and PolicyForge encodes the operational limits your safety team already owns.

PolicyForge

Encodes operational-limit and approval-gate rules as checkable tests before deployment.

DeepScan (adaptive testing)

Tests the agent’s behavior at the IT/OT boundary without source access to control systems.

FixLoop

Enforces least-privilege control-system access and re-tests on every change.

Regulation mapping

Tested against controls derived from your regime.

Regulation names are proof, not decoration — Verigrey doesn't claim to make you compliant. It tests against controls derived from these regimes and hands you the evidence.

CISA critical-infra guidance
Tested against: Cybersecurity expectations for critical-infrastructure operators.
NIST CSF 2.0
Tested against: Access-control and operational-risk baselines.
Sector safety regulators
Tested against: Aviation, rail, and mode-specific safety-boundary compliance.
GDPR / CCPA / PDPA
Tested against: Passenger data protection across jurisdictions.
Filter by regulation
RegulationControl areaVerigrey policyLifecycle stageEvidence output
CISA critical-infra guidanceCyber-physical securityOperational-limit policyDefine / TestOperational-boundary test report
NIST CSF 2.0Access controlLeast-privilege control-system policyTest / ProtectAccess-scope enforcement log
Sector safety regulatorsOperational safetyApproval-gate policyDefine / ProveSafety-validation evidence pack
GDPR / CCPA / PDPAPassenger dataData-boundary isolation policyTestPII-leak trace record
9× more violations found vs. standard red-team benchmarks
OWASP Agentic Top 10MITRE ATLASNIST AI RMF
dispatch_agent →proposed route exceeding HOS limitFLAGGEDoperational-limit policy violatedgated for approval

See it catch a real violation.

Book a demo and watch Verigrey run against a scenario like the ones on this page.

Concerns

What we hear before the demo.

Our operational systems are air-gapped.

Agents create new bridges even into air-gapped environments — Verigrey tests the agent’s actual trajectory, not just the network diagram.

We don’t want you touching our control-system source.

Adaptive testing verifies behavior without source access to control systems — only the agent’s interface is tested.

Safety validation needs to happen before deployment.

PolicyForge and DeepScan test operational-boundary policies pre-deployment, not after an incident.

Where this fits

Part of the full assurance loop.

Operational risk has to be caught before it becomes physical \u2014 Define sets the operational boundary, Test drives the agent against it, and Re-test closes the gap on every change.

1
Define

PolicyForge

Plain-English rules → formal, checkable tests

2
Test

DeepScan

Adaptive testing — 9× more violations found

3
Re-test

FixLoop

Root-cause + fix, re-test on every agent change

4
Protect

RuntimeGuard

Same policies monitored on live traffic, streamed to your SOC

5
Prove

ProofLedger

Regulator-ready, OWASP/MITRE-mapped audit evidence

Keep operational agents inside safe bounds.

Book a demo and see Verigrey gate an out-of-bounds operational action before it executes.

Book a demo