Verigrey
Full-lifecycle agent assurance · Pre-deployment and runtime, in one platform

Deploy AI agents you can trust — before launch, and every day after.

Verigrey is the only behavioral assurance platform for AI agents, built for how agents actually fail. We automate behavioral, security, and policy compliance testing pre-deployment and runtime — catching 9x more vulnerabilities without needing your source code

Live violation feed
across 3 detection classes
SecurityLLM01
Prompt injection

Agent followed an injected instruction to exfiltrate stored credentials.

PolicyDATA-04
External comms after read

Sent an outbound email within 3 tool-calls of reading a sensitive record.

Agent behaviorTRAJ-12
Tool-chain deviation

Called the payments API after a request scoped to read-only lookup.

SecurityLLM06
Sensitive info disclosure

Leaked customer PII inside a tool response returned to the end user.

PolicyGEO-02
Data residency breach

Routed EU customer data to a non-EU model provider mid-session.

SecurityLLM08
Excessive agency

Escalated its own permissions without a human approval step.

Agent behaviorGOAL-07
Goal drift

Pursued an unintended sub-goal after the primary tool call failed.

SecurityLLM04
Data poisoning

Treated a malicious tool output as ground truth for later reasoning.

PolicyAUTH-09
Scope violation

Accessed a record outside the tenant boundary of the requesting user.

Agent behaviorLOOP-03
Unbounded retry

Retried a denied action 40+ times, evading a rate-limit guardrail.

SecurityLLM01
Prompt injection

Agent followed an injected instruction to exfiltrate stored credentials.

PolicyDATA-04
External comms after read

Sent an outbound email within 3 tool-calls of reading a sensitive record.

Agent behaviorTRAJ-12
Tool-chain deviation

Called the payments API after a request scoped to read-only lookup.

SecurityLLM06
Sensitive info disclosure

Leaked customer PII inside a tool response returned to the end user.

PolicyGEO-02
Data residency breach

Routed EU customer data to a non-EU model provider mid-session.

SecurityLLM08
Excessive agency

Escalated its own permissions without a human approval step.

Agent behaviorGOAL-07
Goal drift

Pursued an unintended sub-goal after the primary tool call failed.

SecurityLLM04
Data poisoning

Treated a malicious tool output as ground truth for later reasoning.

PolicyAUTH-09
Scope violation

Accessed a record outside the tenant boundary of the requesting user.

Agent behaviorLOOP-03
Unbounded retry

Retried a denied action 40+ times, evading a rate-limit guardrail.

Regulator-ready evidence mapped to the frameworks your auditors already use

OWASP Agentic Top 10MITRE ATLASNIST AI RMFNYDFS 500GLBA
Coming soon
SOXSR 11-7HIPAACPNICISAPDPAGDPR
The shift

Agents are everywhere — and mostly ungoverned.

80% of enterprise apps shipped in Q1 2026 embed at least one AI agent, up from 33% in 2024. Only 14% of those agents went live with full security and IT sign-off. Deployment is accelerating across four channels — each opens new paths to rogue behavior, silent failure, and policy violations.

Channel 01

Internal workflow

IT helpdesk, code, finance ops, doc summarization — the first wave.

~48%
of orgs run internal process-automation agents
Channel 02

External-facing

Customer-support & sales agents acting with customers in real time.

23%
of financial-services deployments are customer-support agents
Channel 03

Vendor / embedded

Third-party agents inside the SaaS you already buy — governed by no one internally.

40%
of enterprise apps will embed vendor agents by end-2026
Channel 04

Shadow (employee)

Unsanctioned agents employees build & connect via ungoverned MCP servers.

~1,200
unofficial AI apps in the average enterprise

Sources: Beam.ai / Gravitee State of AI Agent Security 2026 · Netskope 2026 · Optro AI Oversight Gap 2026 · Gartner · S&P Global · McKinsey · CrewAI.

The stakes

Today's tools and red-teams can't keep up with agents that change weekly.

$4.7M
average cost of an AI agent-related breach
84%
of orgs deploying agents report incidents
14%
of agents reach production with full security sign-off
21%
can see what their agents actually access, call, or touch

Slow & manual

Weeks per red-team engagement, gated on scarce human experts you can’t hire fast enough.

Limited violation types

Prompt-injection checklists and trial-and-error miss the tool-mediated failure paths agents actually take.

Post-deployment

Monitoring watches agents after they’re live — the damage is already done.

Blind to change

A new model, prompt, or tool silently breaks assurance. Re-testing means starting over.

No policy formalization

Turning "no PII after a tool call" into an actual test takes deep engineering effort.

No audit evidence

Attestation and dashboards — not the auditable proof regulators now expect.

Why Verigrey

The only full-lifecycle assurance built for how agents fail and behave — from the inside, and before deployment.

Adaptive testing, not black-box guessing
Finds more comprehensive violations
Full lifecycle agent assurance — before and after deployment
Understand root cause of violations and get fix suggestions before going live
Natural language policy testing
Few hours vs. weeks of costly manual red teams
Regulator-ready audit evidence
No source code access needed
Peer-reviewed proof

Verigrey uncovers what published state-of-the-art misses.

AgentDojo · NeurIPS 2024

Attack success rate (%) — higher means more real issues found. 629 test cases across Workspace, Slack, Banking & Travel.

GPT-4.1
37.7
70.7
Gemini-2.5 Flash
36.8
47.4
Qwen-3 235B
67.6
81.7
VerigreyPublished baseline

+33.0 pp uplift on GPT-4.1 · +32.0 pp on Hard-tier tasks — the ones supposed to be well-defended.

OpenClaw · 1.5M-deployment agent

Head-to-head against expert manual testing across 3 LLM backends.

9×
more security issues found than expert manual testing
Kimi-K2.510 vs 1
Claude Opus 4.69 vs 1
GPT-5.28 vs 1
Common questions

What enterprise buyers ask first.

Prove your agents before they ship. Watch them after.

Book a demo. A solutions engineer will scope your top agent use cases and return a test plan — usually within one business day.