Verigrey
Telecom

An agent that leaks CPNI or enables a SIM-swap is a regulatory and fraud nightmare. Prevent both.

Verigrey tests telecom agents against CPNI-derived controls — verifying identity checks, blocking unauthorized account changes, and stopping subscriber-data leakage — across the full lifecycle.

Live call-session inspection
Account action · SIM port request
port initiated without identity re-verification
FLAGGED · unauthorized change
PROVEevidence · 0x6b1a…f04d
Why agents are different here

This isn't a generic agent-risk problem.

Call, usage, and billing data is federally protected CPNI, and agents that can change plans or ports create a new SIM-swap fraud surface — at a scale of millions of subscriber interactions with no human in the loop.

CPNI
Customer call/usage/billing data is federally protected with strict disclosure rules.
Account takeover
Agents that change plans or ports are a SIM-swap fraud surface.
Scale
Millions of subscriber interactions, no human in the loop.
Common agent use cases

The agents this buyer is actually deploying.

Customer-care agent

Handles billing, plans, and troubleshooting.

FailureDiscloses CPNI without authorization or to the wrong subscriber.
FixDeepScan + PolicyForge.

Account-management agent

Processes plan changes, ports, and SIM requests.

FailureMakes an unauthorized change that enables a SIM-swap.
FixPolicyForge + DeepScan + RuntimeGuard.

Retention / sales agent

Handles retention offers and upsells.

FailureMakes deceptive pricing or coverage statements.
FixDeepScan.

Network-ops copilot

Assists network operations staff.

FailureHas over-broad access to subscriber data.
FixFixLoop.
Specific risks

What keeps you up at night.

CPNI disclosure

FCC

Agent discloses call, usage, or billing data without proper authorization.

Pretexting / SIM-swap

FCC / fraud

Unauthorized account change enables account takeover via SIM-swap.

Subscriber-PII leakage

CCPA / CPRA

Personal data surfaces to the wrong session or party.

Deceptive marketing

UDAP

Sales agent overstates pricing, coverage, or terms.

How Verigrey solves it

Across the full lifecycle — Define to Prove.

DeepScan drives the agent through real identity-verification and account-change paths, PolicyForge encodes the auth-gate your fraud team needs, and RuntimeGuard streams monitoring to your SOC.

PolicyForge

Encodes identity-verification and auth-gate rules for any account-changing action.

DeepScan (adaptive testing)

Tests the full trajectory, not just the IVR script — the paths a SIM-swap actually uses.

RuntimeGuard

Monitors the same policies on live traffic and streams flags directly to your SOC and fraud systems.

Regulation mapping

Tested against controls derived from your regime.

Regulation names are proof, not decoration — Verigrey doesn't claim to make you compliant. It tests against controls derived from these regimes and hands you the evidence.

CPNI (FCC)
Tested against: Authorized disclosure of customer call, usage, and billing data.
TCPA
Tested against: Consent controls around subscriber communications.
FCC cyber / CISA
Tested against: Critical-infrastructure cybersecurity expectations.
CCPA / CPRA
Tested against: Subscriber personal-data protection.
Filter by regulation
RegulationControl areaVerigrey policyLifecycle stageEvidence output
CPNI (FCC)Data disclosureIdentity-verification gate policyTest / ProtectDisclosure trace record
TCPAConsent controlsConsent-verification policyTestConsent-compliance trace
FCC cyber / CISACritical-infra securityAccess-scope policyProtectRuntime monitoring log
CCPA / CPRASubscriber data protectionPII-boundary isolation policyTestPII-leak trace record
9× more violations found vs. standard red-team benchmarks
OWASP Agentic Top 10MITRE ATLASNIST AI RMF
account_agent →processed port request without re-verificationFLAGGEDauth-gate policy violatedblocked before commit

See it catch a real violation.

Book a demo and watch Verigrey run against a scenario like the ones on this page.

Concerns

What we hear before the demo.

This needs to integrate with our fraud stack.

RuntimeGuard streams flags directly to your SOC and fraud systems — it’s built to sit alongside them, not replace them.

We run at massive scale and low latency.

Runtime monitoring is designed for high-volume, low-latency subscriber traffic.

We already have IVR-based authentication.

Agents introduce new bypass paths your IVR was never tested against — adaptive testing covers the agent’s full trajectory.

Where this fits

Part of the full assurance loop.

Fraud happens in real time \u2014 so this is Test finding the bypass path in advance, Protect blocking it live, and Prove giving your fraud and compliance teams the record.

1
Define

PolicyForge

Plain-English rules → formal, checkable tests

2
Test

DeepScan

Adaptive testing — 9× more violations found

3
Re-test

FixLoop

Root-cause + fix, re-test on every agent change

4
Protect

RuntimeGuard

Same policies monitored on live traffic, streamed to your SOC

5
Prove

ProofLedger

Regulator-ready, OWASP/MITRE-mapped audit evidence

Protect subscriber data and stop agent-driven fraud.

Book a demo and see Verigrey block an unauthorized account change before it commits.

Book a demo