Verigrey
Manufacturing

Agents are reaching into your OT and your IP. Prove they can't cross the line.

Verigrey tests manufacturing agents against your operational, safety, and data-protection policies — blocking unsafe actions and IP leakage before they happen, without source access to your systems.

Live IT/OT boundary inspection
Tool call · design file export
proprietary CAD spec shared with external vendor agent
FLAGGED · IP exfiltration
PROVEevidence · 0x8c25…3f9e
Why agents are different here

This isn't a generic agent-risk problem.

Agents now bridge business systems and operational technology, touching the proprietary designs, formulas, and process IP that are a manufacturer's crown jewels — with real physical and supply-chain consequences.

IT/OT convergence
Agents bridge business systems and operational technology.
Proprietary data
Designs, formulas, and process IP are the crown jewels.
Physical + supply-chain
Actions have operational and third-party consequences.
Common agent use cases

The agents this buyer is actually deploying.

Supply-chain / procurement agent

Manages vendor communication and procurement.

FailureLeaks pricing or contract IP, or over-shares with vendor agents.
FixDeepScan + PolicyForge.

Production / quality copilot

Assists production and quality-control decisions.

FailureMakes an unsafe operational recommendation or has over-broad OT access.
FixPolicyForge + FixLoop.

Engineering / design assistant

Assists engineering and design workflows.

FailureExfiltrates proprietary design or IP via a tool call.
FixDeepScan.

Maintenance / ops agent

Recommends and executes maintenance actions.

FailureTakes a destructive action on equipment systems without a gate.
FixPolicyForge + DeepScan.
Specific risks

What keeps you up at night.

IP / proprietary-data leakage

Trade secret

Design, formula, or process IP surfaces outside its authorized boundary.

Unsafe operational actions

IEC 62443

Agent recommends or executes an action outside a safety boundary.

Over-broad OT/control-system access

NIST CSF 2.0

Copilot reaches further into control systems than the task requires.

Supply-chain over-sharing

CISA critical-infra

Procurement agent shares more contract or pricing data than a vendor agent needs.

How Verigrey solves it

Across the full lifecycle — Define to Prove.

DeepScan tests IT/OT boundary behavior without source access to control systems, PolicyForge encodes the operational limits your safety team owns, and FixLoop keeps control-system access at least-privilege.

PolicyForge

Encodes operational-limit, approval-gate, and IP data-boundary rules as checkable tests.

DeepScan (adaptive testing)

Catches exfiltration paths a black-box scanner misses, without needing source access to control systems.

FixLoop

Enforces least-privilege access to OT and control systems, re-testing on every change.

Regulation mapping

Tested against controls derived from your regime.

Regulation names are proof, not decoration — Verigrey doesn't claim to make you compliant. It tests against controls derived from these regimes and hands you the evidence.

NIST CSF 2.0 / 800-53
Tested against: Access-control and operational-risk baselines.
IEC 62443
Tested against: Industrial automation and control-system security.
CISA critical-infra guidance
Tested against: Cybersecurity expectations for critical-infrastructure manufacturers.
GDPR / CCPA / PDPA
Tested against: Protection of personal data touched by manufacturing agents.
Filter by regulation
RegulationControl areaVerigrey policyLifecycle stageEvidence output
NIST CSF 2.0 / 800-53Access controlLeast-privilege control-system policyTest / ProtectAccess-scope enforcement log
IEC 62443Industrial control securityOperational-limit policyDefine / TestOperational-boundary test report
CISA critical-infra guidanceCritical-infra cybersecurityIT/OT boundary policyTestBoundary-crossing trace record
GDPR / CCPA / PDPAPersonal data protectionData-boundary isolation policyTestPII-leak trace record
9× more violations found vs. standard red-team benchmarks
OWASP Agentic Top 10MITRE ATLASNIST AI RMF
design_assistant →shared CAD spec with external vendor toolFLAGGEDIP data-boundary policy violatedblocked before commit

See it catch a real violation.

Book a demo and watch Verigrey run against a scenario like the ones on this page.

Concerns

What we hear before the demo.

We need to validate safety before deployment.

PolicyForge and DeepScan test operational-boundary policies pre-deployment, not after an incident.

You won’t get access to our control-system source.

Adaptive testing catches exfiltration paths a black-box review misses — without integration into control-system source.

Our OT and IT are already separated.

Agents create new bridges across that separation — Verigrey tests the agent’s actual trajectory across the boundary.

Where this fits

Part of the full assurance loop.

OT and IP risk has to be caught at the boundary \u2014 Define sets the data and operational limits, Test drives the agent against them, and Protect monitors the same rules on live traffic.

1
Define

PolicyForge

Plain-English rules → formal, checkable tests

2
Test

DeepScan

Adaptive testing — 9× more violations found

3
Re-test

FixLoop

Root-cause + fix, re-test on every agent change

4
Protect

RuntimeGuard

Same policies monitored on live traffic, streamed to your SOC

5
Prove

ProofLedger

Regulator-ready, OWASP/MITRE-mapped audit evidence

Let agents into your plant without letting risk out.

Book a demo and see Verigrey block an IP-exfiltration attempt at the IT/OT boundary.

Book a demo