Verigrey
Fintech

Ship agents fast without shipping a compliance incident.

Verigrey tests fintech agents against UDAAP, GLBA and NYDFS-derived controls — catching unlicensed advice and data leakage before release, and re-testing on every change.

Live release scan
Chat reply · financial guidance
\u201cyou should move your savings into this fund\u201d
FLAGGED · unlicensed advice
PROVEevidence · 0x1c9e…44b7
Why agents are different here

This isn't a generic agent-risk problem.

Fintechs move fast and ship agents straight to customers — but one unlicensed-advice moment or data leak can trigger a UDAAP/CFPB enforcement action that ends the business.

23%
Of financial-services agent deployments are customer-facing.
Every release
A model or prompt change can silently reintroduce a violation.
UDAAP / CFPB
Consumer-protection enforcement is the existential risk.
Common agent use cases

The agents this buyer is actually deploying.

Customer-support / servicing agent

Handles billing, disputes, and account servicing.

FailureLeaks account data or makes an unauthorized commitment.
FixDeepScan + RuntimeGuard.

Onboarding / KYC agent

Verifies identity and opens new accounts.

FailureBypasses KYC checks or mishandles PII during onboarding.
FixPolicyForge + DeepScan.

Lending / credit-decision copilot

Assists underwriting and credit decisions.

FailureProduces fair-lending discrimination across protected classes.
FixDeepScan.

Financial-guidance chatbot

Answers customer questions about products and money management.

FailureGives unlicensed investment or tax advice.
FixPolicyForge + DeepScan.
Specific risks

What keeps you up at night.

Unlicensed advice

UDAAP / Reg BI

Chatbot crosses from information into a recommendation no licensed advisor approved.

PII / financial-data leakage

GLBA / NYDFS 500

Account or transaction data surfaces to the wrong session or party.

Deceptive statements

UDAAP / Reg Z

Agent overstates a rate, fee, or guarantee in a customer-facing reply.

KYC/AML bypass

BSA / AML

Onboarding flow lets a tool call skip a required verification step.

How Verigrey solves it

Across the full lifecycle — Define to Prove.

DeepScan runs in CI on every release, PolicyForge encodes the consumer-protection rules your legal team already wrote, and ProofLedger gives you evidence to hand partners and regulators.

DeepScan (adaptive testing)

Tests the full multi-turn, tool-mediated trajectory — the paths static guardrails never see.

PolicyForge

Encodes UDAAP, KYC/AML, and fair-lending rules as checkable, versioned tests.

FixLoop

Re-tests on every model or prompt change, so a regression never reaches production unnoticed.

Regulation mapping

Tested against controls derived from your regime.

Regulation names are proof, not decoration — Verigrey doesn't claim to make you compliant. It tests against controls derived from these regimes and hands you the evidence.

UDAAP
Tested against: Unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts and practices in customer communication.
GLBA
Tested against: Safeguarding of nonpublic personal financial information.
NYDFS 500
Tested against: Cybersecurity controls around customer financial data access.
ECOA / Reg B
Tested against: Non-discrimination in credit decisions.
Reg Z (TILA)
Tested against: Accurate disclosure of credit terms and pricing.
BSA / AML
Tested against: KYC and anti-money-laundering verification controls.
Filter by regulation
RegulationControl areaVerigrey policyLifecycle stageEvidence output
UDAAPConsumer communicationDeceptive-statement detection policyTestFlagged-reply trace record
GLBAPII safeguardingData-boundary isolation policyTest / ProtectPII-leak trace record
NYDFS 500Cybersecurity controlsAccess-scope policyProtectRuntime monitoring log
ECOA / Reg BFair lendingDisparate-impact test policyTestFairness benchmark results
Reg Z (TILA)Pricing disclosureAccurate-terms policyTestDisclosure accuracy report
BSA / AMLKYC verificationOnboarding verification-gate policyDefine / TestKYC-bypass trace record
9× more violations found vs. standard red-team benchmarks
OWASP Agentic Top 10MITRE ATLASNIST AI RMFOWASP MCP Top 10
guidance_bot →recommended moving funds into product XFLAGGEDunlicensed-advice policy violatedevidence logged

See it catch a real violation.

Book a demo and watch Verigrey run against a scenario like the ones on this page.

Concerns

What we hear before the demo.

We already have guardrails.

Static guardrails miss multi-turn and tool-mediated paths — adaptive testing drives the agent through the full trajectory to find what they can’t.

This will slow down how fast we ship.

Verigrey runs in CI and re-tests on every change — it doesn’t sit in the release path, it watches it.

How do we prove this to partners?

ProofLedger produces evidence you can hand to partners, banks, and regulators without exposing your source.

Where this fits

Part of the full assurance loop.

Fintech ships fast — so this is Test running continuously in CI, Re-test closing the loop on every release, and Prove producing the evidence your partners and regulators expect.

1
Define

PolicyForge

Plain-English rules → formal, checkable tests

2
Test

DeepScan

Adaptive testing — 9× more violations found

3
Re-test

FixLoop

Root-cause + fix, re-test on every agent change

4
Protect

RuntimeGuard

Same policies monitored on live traffic, streamed to your SOC

5
Prove

ProofLedger

Regulator-ready, OWASP/MITRE-mapped audit evidence

Move fast. Stay clean.

Book a demo and see Verigrey catch an unlicensed-advice reply before it ships.

Book a demo